Sample ballots are now available from the Arkansas Secretary of State. Be sure to download and print your sample ballot to ensure you know everything you’re voting on.
Monday Update (10/10)
1.) The Immunization Fraud: Flu Vaccines Don’t Stop You from Getting Flu
2.) mRNA Technology Is Stranger Than Fiction
Everything we thought we knew about the spike protein, mRNA, etc…. turned on its head here. https://www.redvoicemedia.com/video/2022/10/zelenko-report-mrna-technology-is-stranger-than-fiction-episode-49-with-karen-kingston/
Friday Update (10/7)
1.) CDC Allocated $85 Million For Grants Requiring Schools To Start Student-Led Clubs For LGBT Youth
Thursday Update (10/6)
1.) Doctors Speak Out Against ‘Medical Totalitarianism’ as Newsom Signs Bill That Punishes Doctors for COVID ‘Misinformation’
California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Friday signed a bill that subjects the state’s doctors to discipline, including the suspension of their medical licenses, for sharing “misinformation” or “disinformation” about COVID-19 with their patients.
2.) Judicial Watch Uncovers Biden Administration Propaganda Plan to Push COVID Vaccine
3.) Are you subscribed? If you are not getting our emails (always check your spam folder) and would like to, click the ‘Subscribe’ tab above.
4.) Pfizer Is Now Experimenting With mRNA Flu Vaccines.
Wednesday Update (10/5)
1.) Pure Communist Tactics in California: California doctors could lose licenses for spreading unapproved COVID-19 info | Just The News
2.) Keep Libraries Safe! We are working with the legislature to hold woke librarians accountable to the taxpayers. If you find inappropriate books in the children’s section of your local library, please fill out this form and include a photo if available.
Tuesday Update (10/4)
1.) Biden phones hero Coast Guard diver to congratulate him for rescuing lives of Florida residents – just days before he will FIRE him for being unvaccinated as 20,000 members of military face axe
2.) The 70 Seconds that Shook the World – MUST READ article on 3/16/20 lockdowns
3.) The FDA Misled the Public About Ivermectin and Should Be Accountable in Court, Argues the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS)
https://www.yahoo.com/now/fda-misled-public-ivermectin-accountable-144900899.html
Monday Update (10/3)
1.) Outsourced censorship: Feds used private entity to target millions of social posts in 2020
Biden administration gave millions in tax dollars to groups after election, records show. Election Integrity Partnership says it had 35% success rate getting tech platforms to label, remove or restrict content.
2.) NYC: Judge rules vaccine mandate invalid for PBA members
A judge has ruled that New York City’s COVID vaccine mandate is invalid as it applies to members of the Police Benevolent Association.
https://abc7ny.com/covid-mandate-pba-police-officers-benevolent-association/12256476/
3.) CDC drops universal masking guideline for healthcare workers
4.) COVID-19 Vaccine mRNA now found in breastmilk
And – details on these test results being withheld from the public
https://technofog.substack.com/p/covid-19-vaccine-mrna-now-found-in
Thursday Update (9/29)
1.) Detection of Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Human Breast Milk
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/article-abstract/2796427
2.) Vaccination Increases Infection Risk by 44%, Oxford Study Finds https://dailysceptic.org/2022/09/28/vaccination-increases-infection-risk-by-44-oxford-study-finds/
3.) Dr. Aseem Malhotra promoted Covid-19 vaccine on TV, now says stop
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/dr-aseem-malhotra-promoted-covid
4.) How a false hydroxychloroquine narrative was created, and much more
https://merylnass.substack.com/p/how-a-false-hydroxychloroquine-narrative-23d/comments
The State Lost a Good Senator – The “Establishment” Wins Again
By: Chris Stafford, Reopen Arkansas
The State lost a good Senator today, not to an election loss, not to Covid, but to a Kangaroo Court “hearing” on Tuesday, 9/27/2022 lead by the Senator’s own party and more closely resembling something one would expect in Cuba or China – not the Arkansas Senate. “Kangaroo Court” is aptly termed because the outcome resulting in Senator Alan Clark’s ouster from the State Senate was predetermined at least a week prior to the hearing. Moreover, it was scheduled intentionally so as to prevent the attendance of Senator Clark or his legal counsel and deprived Senator Clark of the ability to answer the (frivolous/pithy) allegations or present any defense. “Kangaroo Court” indeed – devoid of the most basic due process.
The hearing can be seen here, but for those of you looking for the cliff-notes version of the ousting Senator Alan Clark from the Arkansas State Senate, it can be succinctly summarized and described as follows:
ESTABLISHMENT SENATE LEADERSHIP: We think you (Clark) should have somehow divined the that good Senator Flowers had no ill intent (in collecting thousands in unauthorized per-diem travel payments), and if you didn’t divine it, we told you so. After we told you so, we also told you to drop the ethics complaint you filed regarding those travel payments. You didn’t listen to us and do what we told you, so under the guise that we’re a body concerned about ethics, we’re going to attack you, the whistleblower who brought forth the travel payment issue, and effectively toss you from the Senate, disenfranchising voters state-wide and leaving your district constituents without representation.
To add insult to injury in Tuesday’s proceedings, while the Senate went about the formality of the dog-pony show trial, a few made it a point to call Senator Clark their “friend” and mumble how much they cared and how difficult this was (yes stabbing a friend in the back over no legal violations probably is “difficult”, unless one is a psychopath). Alas, the majority openly bemoaned how much time the kangaroo court was taking and urged haste and speed so they could get back to their tractors and other important things – apparently during fall harvest time in Arkansas, due-process is suspended. My favorite quote of the day goes to Senator Blake Johnson: “I don’t want to hear anything about due process” (isn’t that a great quote from a lawmaker – arguing Senator Clark had no “right” to due process).
Let’s get to the final outcome. Normally in these things, a censure or fine is levied and everyone moves on. In this case, Senator Clark was stripped of all senate duties, responsibilities, and seniority; banned from the legislator building facilities; stripped of all equipment (senate phone, computer and even license plate and parking), for the remainder of the legislative session, and WITH A RECOMMENDATION that the next 2023 Senate carry that over for another 2 YEARS. Such is unprecedented in State history for the degree of “offense” allegedly committed. So, what did he do to deserve this? He filed a whistleblower ethics complaint. No crimes, no theft, no immoral actions, no stepping on puppies or running over small children in crosswalks – he filed an ethics report under the Senate’s own rules and provisions to do so. Let that sink in – he filed a whistleblower ethics report over another Senator’s suspected and apparent fraudulent receipt of State travel funds. A complaint that the establishment Senate Ethics Committee (in secret meeting) later divines that Senator Clark somehow had retaliatory “intent” in filing. We should all be comforted that the capable State Senate have the infallible ability to divine the INTENT of others, and are so certain of it that they were by a 90+ percent majority happy to toss a sitting senior Senator (a Republican not favored by the liberal press) out of the State legislature, while having the clarity to clear another senior Senator (a Democrat with the liberal press on speed dial) after practicing this nifty “intent divining” ability and determining her (innocent) intent (never mind it had all the optics of misappropriation of several thousand in travel dollars.)
So, WHY did they do this? Rumor and speculation has it that in the fiscal research/investigation for Senator Clark’s whistleblower ethics complaint, it was also uncovered that many, if not all, the Senate members had been receiving unauthorized week-end travel per-diem payments (In fairness, the rules on this are vague and likely weren’t known by the members). During the hearing, there was reference to Senator Clark making “threats” of further reporting. Was this a case of self-preservation by the Senate to cover more significant fiscal irresponsibility and misuse of State funds, and sending a strong message to others to shut up or else? You be the judge.
“Travesty of justice” doesn’t begin to touch on what was done to Senator Clark by the State Senate, just as “childish” and “retributional” barely begin to describe the motivational intent that was present for all but the blind to see. The State Senate tossed a senior duly-elected Senator who was dedicated and bulldoggish in fighting for the people of Arkansas, more consistently than just about any other legislator in the State, over “retaliatory intent” – not a crime or “offense” even described in the Senate’s own ethics rules. Ironic, given that the State Legislature’s own actions in the matter seem to exemplify 10-fold that “retaliatory intent” which they profess to be so concerned about. If there is to be “ethics” and enforcement of ethics in the legislature, the process must be open, public, deliberate, beyond reproach, and evidence-based with due process, and not based on “feeling” or “intent”, with an appearance of back-room coverup; and, must be lead or overseen by an outside independent entity – a government agency can not police itself.
Wednesday Update (9/28)
1.) The State lost a good Senator today – by Chris Stafford
SUMMARY AND THOUGHTS: For those of you who just want the cliff-notes, the Kangaroo Court (accurately termed because I have it on good authority the outcome was predetermined at least a week ago) of today's senate hearing ousting Senator Alan Clark from the Senate can be succinctly summarized as follows: SENATE: We think you (Clark) should have divined the that good Senator Flowers had no ill intent, and if you didn't divine it, we told you so. After we told you so, we also told you to drop the complaint against her. You didn't listen to us and do what we told you, so under the guise that we're a body concerned about ethics, we're going to smack you and effectively toss you from the Senate, disenfranchising voters state-wide and leaving your district constituents without representation. To add insult to injury in todays proceedings, while the Senate went about the formality of the dog-pony show, a few made it a point to call Senator Clark their "friend" and mumble how much they cared and how difficult this was (yes stabbing your friends in the back probably is "difficult" unless one is a psychopath). Alas, the majority openly bemoaned how much time the kangaroo court was taking and urged haste and speed so they could get back to their tractors and other "important" things. My favorite quote of the day goes to Senator Blake Johnson: "I don't want to hear anything about due process" (isn't that a great quote from a lawmaker). As to the penalty (stripping Senator Clark of all senate duties/responsibility, banning him from the building, taking his senate phone, computer and even license plate and parking)..... such is unprecedented for the degree of "offense" allegedly committed. No crimes, no theft, no immoral actions, no stepping on puppies or running over nuns in crosswalks - filing an ethics complaint over apparent fraud. Let that sink in. Filing an ethics complaint. One that the establishment Senate later divines that Clark had retaliatory intent in filing. We should all be comforted that so many in the Senate have the infallible ability to divine the INTENT of others, and are so certain of it that by a 90+ percent majority are happy to toss one sitting senior Senator - a white male one not favored by the liberal press - out of the body, while having the clarity to clear another senior senator - a black female one with the press on speed dial- after divining her (innocent) intent (never mind it had all the optics of misappropriation of several thousand in travel $). "Travesty of justice" doesn't begin to touch on what was done today, just as "childish" and "retributional" barely begins to describe the motivational intent that was present for all but the blind to see. They tossed a Senator who fought harder for the people than about any other in the State, over "retaliatory intent", ironically while their own actions as a body exemplified "retaliatory intent" 10-fold. Chris Stafford
2.) FDA updates COVID-19 test policy to cut emergency use requests
Revising its COVID-19 test policy, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said Tuesday that the agency would review only a small number of new emergency use authorization (EUA) requests for diagnostic tests.
Instead, the FDA urges developers seeking authorizations for their tests to pursue the traditional pathways for approval through the de novo classification or 510(k) clearance. However, the agency will continue to review the currently pending EUA requests.
Noting that the agency has issued EUAs for 430 COVID-19 tests so far, the FDA said that these tests provide adequate testing capacity throughout the U.S.
Given the current level of the production capacity and consumer access to tests, “shifting to traditional premarket review would best meet the public health needs at the current stage of the COVID-19 public health emergency,” said Jeff Shuren, director of the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health.
The revised policy marks a shift in the FDA’s priorities as the COVID-19 impact wanes. Last month, the Biden administration announced plans to transition the government-led procurement and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutics to the commercial market.