2.) The end of Covid-19 vaccine safety science in America
On June 28, the FDA decided that henceforth THEY will choose the variants for reformulated Covid-19 shots and NO clinical trials will be conducted to evaluate safety. Because $cience.
3.) Astonishing Testimony From Dr. Birx Lost Amid Landmark SCOTUS Rulings
With several controversial SCOTUS rulings addressing divisive issues like gun rights and abortion, an exchange between Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and Dr. Debra Birx during a congressional hearing on Thursday escaped scrutiny. However, if a power-hungry politician, university, or employer compelled you or someone you love to receive an experimental vaccine in the last two years, it may make you furious. And Birx should be ashamed of herself for not speaking out earlier.
The House Oversight and Reform Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis held a hearing with Birx Thursday morning. Jordan questioned Birx on the United States’ participation in and funding of the World Health Organization and gain of function research. Birx was candid that she felt the United States should withhold funding from the WHO until needed reforms occurred. She also admitted the U.S. should not participate in some gain-of-function research, such as any in China.
However, Jordan’s questions about the Biden administration’s message on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness should shock the conscience. Jordan asked Birx if the government was lying or guessing when it told the public that people who received the vaccination couldn’t get COVID. Birx responded that she did not know. However, she continued:
“All I know is there was evidence from the global pandemic that natural reinfection was occurring. Since the vaccine was based on natural immunity, you cannot make the conclusion that the vaccine will do better than natural infection. Although it can often do slightly better.”
1.) More Boosters Coming Soon to a Pharmacy Near You
A panel of outside advisors to the FDA has voted 19-2 in favor of updating COVID-19 booster shots to include protection against Omicron. It’s a significant decision as it marks the first time the panel has proposed that vaccine makers modify their jabs to target a different strain. Alpha, Beta and Delta have already made their way through the world without any updates to the shots, as well as their sub-variants that have caused several big waves of infections.
Fine print: Much of the FDA panel discussion focused on whether the Omicron component should target the “original” strain, BA.1, or newer BA.4 and BA.5 sub-variants, but the voting question did not specifically ask the members to decide between them. The panel was also not asked about whether future boosters should be bivalent – containing protection against the original SARS-CoV-2 variant and Omicron – or just provide protection against the latter. As COVID continues to evolve, the vaccines are said to have become less effective at defending infection and mild illness, but generally protect against severe disease.
Following the committee’s recommendation, the FDA is likely to authorize the vaccine change, meaning a new generation of COVID boosters could be ready by late summer or the early fall. Vaccine manufacturers have already developed Omicron-specific vaccines, but have noted that they tend to generate a lower antibody response against BA.4 and BA.5. If not apparent already, it also appears that COVID is on track to need annual or semi-annual boosters like the flu, compared to viruses like polio and measles, which if vaccinated against as a child, the body will recognize at a much later date.
2.) The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has agreed to reconsider a case challenging the Biden Administration’s federal employee COVID-19 vaccine mandate.
This case challenges an unlawful Executive Order from President Biden, which would force vaccination of approximately 2.1 million federal civilian workers – many against their will.
The Fifth Circuit’s order vacates a February 9, 2022 ruling by a Fifth Circuit panel that lifted an injunction issued by a district court blocking enforcement of the vaccine mandate while the lawsuit played out.
This means the Biden Administration’s illegal federal employee vaccine mandate will be stayed pending the Fifth Circuit’s decision, which we expect to come in the fall of 2022. And it is likely the Fifth Circuit will hold the mandate cannot stand.
Jonelle Fulmer is an establishment RINO. In order to shift the Republican Party of Arkansas back to conservative values, we must replace Jonelle with a true conservative leader who isn’t controlled by the Asa-Hendren leftists.
Public Schools Are Now So Hostile To Christians, They’re Unconstitutional
We have a real opportunity to enact true school choice next year in Arkansas. Stay tuned for action calls as school choice bills start making their way through the legislature. In the meantime, the legislators must resist the temptation to throw more money at public schools. See action call below for details.
2.) One of the 2000 Mules CAUGHT By Project VERITAS Has Been ARRESTED, Facing 20 Years of Prison for Election Fraud
A Texas woman named Rachel Rodriguez was arrested on 26 counts of election fraud, illegal voting, and unlawfully assisting people voting by mail, and unlawfully possessing an official ballot. A Project Veritas video last fall exposed her as she engaged in vote harvesting leading up to the 2020 election.
STATEMENT FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL PAXTON “Many continue to claim that there’s no such thing as election fraud. We’ve always known that such a claim is false and misleading, and today we have additional hard evidence. This is a victory for election integrity and a strong signal that anyone who attempts to defraud the people of Texas, deprive them of their vote, or undermine the integrity of elections will be brought to justice,” said Attorney General Paxton. “The shocking and blatantly illegal action documented by Project Veritas demonstrates a form of election fraud my office continually investigates and prosecutes. I am fiercely committed to ensuring the voting process is secure and fair throughout the state, and my office is prepared to assist any Texas county in combating this insidious, un-American form of fraud.”
Arkansas is collecting far more in taxes than necessary to fund the state government. Our state has amassed an estimated 1.5 Billion dollars in surplus this year alone, with state revenue up 8.5% over last year.
Asa Hutchinson would like to use this money to drastically increase public school teacher salaries without regard to other school employees or how the raise would be funded in future years.
While a teacher pay raise is certainly a noble idea, that leaves out the majority of taxpayers, all of whom are overtaxed. This plan grows government at a time when we should be reducing the size of state government, not expanding it.
This money doesn’t belong to Asa Hutchinson or the legislature. It belongs to the taxpayers of Arkansas, from whom it was taken.
A better, fairer plan would be to accelerate the income tax cuts that were already approved by the legislature. The tax cuts should be ramped up dramatically to return this excess money that has been unnecessarily taken from the hardworking Arkansas taxpayers.
Action:
Strongly recommend to your state legislators that they: (1) deny Asa’s plan for teacher pay raises, and instead (2) return the money to the taxpayers by accelerating the income tax cuts. This would result in a more equitable use of the surplus.
4.) Early COVID Treatment works – yet more examples
There are many paradoxes in the COVID-19 data from the western nations concerning disease and death attributed to SARS-CoV-2 infection. One of the most problematic is the result of widespread systemic reporting bias, in which disease and deaths WITH evidence of infection are grossly over-reported as disease and deaths FROM infection by SARS-CoV-2.
The truth is that we may never be able to resolve this, to get to the bottom of what really went on, due to perverse political and financial incentives to over-report COVID-19 deaths (while also minimizing toxicity of the vaccines). But there is no question that if you are admitted to a western hospital with a COVID-19 diagnosis, your risk of death during that hospitalization has been amazingly high.
There is no question in my mind that early COVID-19 treatment saves lives, and many different repurposed drug treatment protocols for treating this disease have become popular despite withering criticism and gaslighting from FDA, NIH, corporate media and hospitalist physicians.
For example treatment protocols, see those developed by FLCCC, Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, Drs. George Fareed and Brian Tyson , and the European doctors who practice under the banner of Ippocrateorg.org. In just one example, while in the USA Ivermectin has been vilified by both FDA and the press, worldwide adoption of Ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19 disease is now at 45%!
While many of these alternative early treatment and hospital treatment protocols rely on drug combinations which typically include Hydroxychloroquine + Azithromycin (the combo championed by Dr. Didier Raoult) or Ivermectin, there are many other drugs and combinations which have shown substantial efficacy in both outpatient and inpatient treatment environments.
In conclusion, irrespective of the excess death and disease associated with the mandated genetic vaccines, there is no doubt in my mind that the concerted and coordinated propaganda and information control efforts of the United States Government Department of Health and Human Services, acting in alignment and as sponsors of Big Tech and Corporate Media censorship, have cost large amounts of unnecessary death and disease due to both iatrogenic causes during hospitalization as well as by suppression of life saving early treatment protocols. The data supporting this conclusion increase almost daily. The unresolved issue remains. Will anyone be held accountable for this avoidable tragedy?
If masks or mask mandates worked, wouldn’t we see hard evidence of it by now, you know, more than two years in? If there were such evidence, wouldn’t the powers-that-be be shouting it from the rooftops? Instead, they’ve been pretty quiet because of charts like this, which used the CDC’s own data to compare Covid spread in counties that had mask mandates against counties that did not. The result? No discernible difference.
Thankfully, the tide is turning. Key research and data gathering is being conducted and released that continue to put a stake in the heart of forced masking. Here’s a sampling of the latest:
A University of Louisville study released in May 2022 found that mask mandates and greater compliance resulting from them “did not predict lower growth rates when community spread was low (minima) or high (maxima).” The study, which used CDC data across several seasons, found that mask usage and mandates “are not associated with lower SARS-CoV-2 spread among US states.”
Remember that CDC study purporting to show that school masking was effective? Did you wonder what the results would have been if someone had conducted a higher quality study over a greater sample size and period of time? Ambarish Chandra of University of Toronto and Dr. Tracy Hoeg of University of California, Davis did exactly that with this Lancet study titled, “Revisiting Pediatric COVID-19 Cases in Counties With and Without School Mask Requirements—United States, July 1—October 20 2021.” Their results: “… no significant relationship between mask mandates and case rates.” Color me shocked.