Posts

Posted on

Houston hospital workers stage walk-out over jab mandates

After refusing to comply with a deadline for receiving a COVID-19 vaccination, medical workers with Houston Methodist left their posts Monday evening and joined protestors for a rally outside the hospital’s Baytown location.“No one should be forced to put something into their body if they’re not comfortable with it,” said Jennifer Bridges, a nurse who has worked for Houston Methodist for over 6 years.Bridges is one of 117 employees suing after the hospital made the experimental COVID-19 vaccination a condition of employment. In April, Houston Methodist president and CEO Dr. Marc Boom informed employees by email that they must receive at least the first dose of the emergency authorized vaccine by June 7 or they would face termination.Hospital management later specified that employees not vaccinated by the deadline would be placed on a fourteen-day suspension without pay and then terminated. Workers were told they could apply for an exemption for pregnancy or “religious” exceptions.Bridges says she was presented with documentation of her suspension Monday afternoon and told to leave the property. Afterward a group of nearly 150 people, including suspended employees and supporters, gathered on Baker Street next to the hospital for a protest. Many in attendance carried signs defending individual rights and alleging the Houston Methodist vaccine mandate constituted a violation of the Nuremberg Code: a post-World War II statement of medical research ethics that emphasizes voluntary consent to clinical trials, the principles of which have been incorporated into U.S. law code.The protestors were joined by Dr. Angelina Farella, a pediatrician and member of America’s Frontline Doctors, who has been a vocal opponent of mandating the COVID-19 experimental vaccines.In comments to The Texan, Farella explained that she is not anti-vaccination and has administered tens of thousands of other vaccines, but she will not administer any of the COVID-19 vaccinations to her young patients. She also does not recommend the experimental vaccine for most adults.“If you are a healthy American under the age of 50 there is no reason for you to get this vaccine,” said Farella. She added that the vaccine might be dangerous for those who have already recovered from the disease.Farella asserted that Houston Methodist and other vaccine promoters were downplaying data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting Systems (VAERS) indicating that there have been serious side effects and a statistically significant number of deaths in vaccine recipients. She said early data indicates those side effects are particularly dangerous for those who have already had the disease.The employee lawsuit, filed by attorney Jared Woodfill, leads with a quote from Houston Methodist San Jacinto Hospital CEO David Bernard.“100% vaccination is more important than your individual freedom. Every one of you is replaceable.”Originally filed in a Montgomery County district court, the case was last week moved to federal court. “We will fight this all the way to the Supreme Court,” Bridges said Monday. “This is wrongful termination and a violation of our rights.”Woodfill explains that the lawsuit is a “case of first impressions,” meaning that there is little legal precedent for the issues at stake.Bridges and other objectors point out that the four COVID-19 vaccines are under “emergency use authorization” (EUA) and have not yet been fully approved by the FDA. Fully approved treatments must undergo at least two years of clinical trials to assess side effects, but the new vaccines have only been in use since December of 2020. Last year the CDC clarified that EUA vaccines were not permitted to be mandatory.Woodfill says, “The legal question that has not been answered is ‘Can you make participation in a clinical trial a condition of employment?’” On Monday afternoon, Governor Abbott signed Texas Senate Bill (SB) 968, which prohibits businesses from requiring vaccine passports from customers. Earlier this year Abbott issued an executive order prohibiting state agencies, political subdivisions, or any organizations receiving state public funds from requiring consumers to provide documentation of vaccine status. “The state’s vaccine passport ban will have huge implications for these cases in the district courts,” explained Woodfill, who said the cases will proceed in both federal and state courts.Woodfill says that in addition to the 117 plaintiffs, another 50 individuals have indicated interest in joining the lawsuit. U.S. Federal Court Judge Lynn Hughes has requested filings from both parties this week and plans to make a quick decision. Once Hughes has issued a ruling, Woodfill expects there to be an emergency appeal to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.“This issue, in either this case or another, should end up before the Supreme Court,” said Woodfill, who says it is possible the nation’s highest court could take up a similar case before the end of the year.Objectors to the experimental vaccines are hoping the U.S. Supreme Court will address the issue promptly.“This is not how medicine was ever,” said Farella. “Forcing people to get a vaccine, in some cases in which they are already immune since they’ve had the disease, is medical tyranny.”https://thetexan.news/houston-hospital-nurses-stage…/

Posted on

CDC to withdraw PCR tests

CDC withdraws fraudulent PCR testing protocol that was used to falsify covid “positives” to push the plandemic

Sunday, July 25, 2021 by: Mike Adams

CDC withdraws fraudulent PCR testing protocol that was used to falsify covid “positives” to push the plandemic(Natural News)

After more than a year of committing scientific fraud to push false “positives” via PCR testing, the CDC has announced it is withdrawing the RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel on December 31st of this year:After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.The use of PCR tests for covid illness diagnosis is a global scientific fraud, since no PCR instrument can produce quantitative results that might indicate a specific viral load. Yet this CDC-approved testing protocol was relied on to fabricate the “casedemic” illusion which pretended that hundreds of millions of people around the world were infected with covid.The entire thing was an elaborate quack science hoax, and anyone familiar with PCR technology (see below) has known this from the very start.The PCR testing approved by the CDC to diagnose covid was fraudulent from the very first dayPCR instruments are not quantitative instruments. They cannot tell you how much of something is present in a given sample. Every lab scientist familiar with PCR instruments knows this. Yet they continue to go along with the global fraud of diagnosing “positive” cases via PCR testing.The entire covid “plandemic” has been based on fraudulent PCR testing, and now the CDC is announcing it is pulling the most frequently used test, perhaps in an effort to replace the test with yet another fraudulent protocol that can be controlled by health authorities to worsen the “pandemic” on demand (or, perhaps, claim covid has been eliminated and declare victory).From the very start, the entire pandemic has been nothing but a globally coordinated PCR testing fraud. As Thermo-Fischer sales representatives told me in face-to-face meetings, PCR instruments cannot determine quantitative results. They do not use quantitative instrument calibration curves or quantitative external covid standards. This means PCR instruments have no legitimate role in diagnosing any person with illness or covid infections. The mere presence of a single viral fragment, multiplied trillions of times through PCR cycling, does not indicate anything of scientific or diagnostic value.From Great Game India:A Portuguese appeals court has ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test.The court stated, the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used and the viral load present. Citing Jaafar et al. 2020, the court concludes that:“if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.”Similarly, the Austrian court has ruled that PCR tests are not suitable for COVID-19 diagnosis and that lockdowns has no legal or scientific basis.The court pointed out that “a PCR test is not suitable for diagnosis and therefore does not in itself say anything about the disease or infection of a person”.PCR analysts and lab science technicians are complicit in the global covid testing fraud. The entire covid pandemic is a farce, and it was all based on fraudulent PCR testing. Amazingly, even the PCR technicians and analysts all know this. They are taking part in a global scheme to destroy human lives and crush global economies, and they are fully aware that the limitations of their own instruments mean diagnoses of “positive” covid status based on PCR are meaningless.I run multiple mass spec instruments in my private lab, including QQQ and ICP-MS instruments. I am the co-developer of two quantitative methods that were painstakingly developed for quantitating glyphosate molecules in food, and for cannabinoid concentrations in hemp extracts. I am intimately familiar with instrument calibration, external standards, curve fit equations and quantitative analysis. PCR instruments are not capable of any of this. They are useless for diagnosing infectious disease, as they cannot produce viral load concentration results from a given sample.If you want to know how much of something is present in a given sample, you have to use far more complex instruments such as mass spec triple quad instruments (which is what I use to test foods for glyphosate contamination, among other things).As Zero Hedge reports, even Dr. Fauci admits PCR testing is essentially a fraud when it comes to diagnosing covid illness:Dr. Fauci, mid-November, 2020: “What is now sort of evolving into a bit of a standard… if you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more … the chances of it being replication-confident are minuscule… It’s very frustrating for the patients as well as for the physicians, somebody comes in, and they repeat their PCR, and it’s like [a] 37 cycle threshold, but you almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle. …So, I think if somebody does come in with 37, 38, even 36, you got to say, you know, it’s just dead nucleotides, period.”Just as doctors, nurses and pharmacists are taking part in the global criminal covid con, PCR lab technicians and owners are gleefully participating in the same fraud, likely because they are earning huge profits from running fraudulent PCR tests that would never pass the scrutiny of any legitimate scientific test for accuracy or precision.In fact, PCR tests are neither accurate nor precise. The concept of “precision” — which is of utmost importance in quantitative lab analysis involving pesticides, heavy metals, and so on — does not exist in PCR equipment. There is no such thing as precision when you’re multiplying genetic material in the sample itself. This process, by definition, destroys any meaningful knowledge of the mass or concentration in the original sample.If the same approach were used in breathalyzer tests for possible drunk drivers, every living person would be arrested for a DUI, since there is at least one molecule of alcohol circulating in the blood of everyone.The CDC is withdrawing this PCR method most likely because they know the test cannot withstand reasonable scientific scrutiny. They’re trying to cover their tracks and memory hole the fraudulent test that was used to drive the fake covid plandemic in the first place. But we already know the CDC is a criminal front for the vaccine industry, and that the CDC has no scientific credibility or authority whatsoever when it comes to legitimate infectious disease testing.The CDC, just like the PCR test, is a complete fraud.